The stories compare with each other by telling stories of young girls but are different in their styles. the grimm tales seem to be a lot older, and they dont seem to be set in a very contemporary environment like where are you going was. the grimm tales also dont explicitly mention sexuality, wheras the company of wolves and where are you going mention specific sexual acts. overall i would say the grimm tales are more vague in their definition of the path from which it would be wise not to stray.  In where are you going, the story is structured to where you are given a background about the character connie. you are told about her family life and given crucial details about her relationship with her mom and dad as well as her sister. you find out about her attitudes regarding looks and vanity, as well as honesty. then the story progresses by giving a situation where connie faces the fork in the road and you see whatdecisions she makes. I dont know what proairiatic code is though.  The earlier versions have some similarities to the disney versions. they both follow the idea of a pure woman falling for a handsom prince etc. the disney version is certainly much lighter though, and i feel like it emphasizes the good much more. for instance the disney version of cinderella doesnt talk about the sisters cutting off their toes, instead it talks about how perfect cinderellas feet were. i think they do this to appeal to a broader audience as well as to avoid lawsuits and keep the movie tame. in hollywood it seems the original was useful for a rough template, but moretickets could be sold with a "softer" presentation of the story.